Here’s the copyright-free, WordPress-ready English news script based on the Damodar Yadav vs Dhirendra Shastri controversy — perfect for direct posting on your news site 👇
📰 Title:
Damodar Yadav Accuses Bageshwar Dham’s Dhirendra Shastri of Threats and Hate Speech — Calls It a Communal Provocation
📍Main News Story:
Bhopal:
Bageshwar Dham’s spiritual leader Pandit Dhirendra Krishna Shastri has once again landed in controversy.
Dalit-Pichhda Samaj Sangathan national president Damodar Yadav has levelled serious allegations against him.
According to Damodar Yadav, during a recent event in Haryana, Shastri made certain remarks that were “threatening and caste-based.”
He claimed that Shastri said “Thathri maar dunga” (I’ll destroy you), which Yadav interpreted as a death threat.
⚖️ Legal Action and Protest Plans:
Yadav stated that he had earlier written to the President of India regarding this issue but received no response.
He has now announced that he will file a petition in the Madhya Pradesh High Court against Shastri’s alleged remarks and activities.
Yadav further claimed that Shastri’s proposed “Sanatan Ekta Padyatra” (Hindu Unity March) could create caste and communal tension in the society.
Yadav said — “We appealed to the administration several times, but no one listened. Now, we will seek justice from the court.”
🕉️ Response from Shastri’s Side:
So far, there has been no official response from Dhirendra Shastri or his spokespersons.
However, his supporters have dismissed the allegations, calling them “a conspiracy by those opposing Sanatan Dharma.”
The Bageshwar Dham team maintains that Shastri only speaks about Hindu unity and has never targeted any community or caste.
🔎 Background:
- Dhirendra Krishna Shastri has often made headlines for his spiritual discourses and “miracle” claims.
- Damodar Yadav, on the other hand, is known for his activism for Dalit and backward communities.
- The latest dispute revolves around the “Sanatan Ekta Padyatra”, which Yadav wants legally stopped.
📢 Conclusion:
The case has now taken a legal turn.
While one side claims to be working for religious unity, the other warns of rising caste-based and communal tension.
The court’s response in the coming days will determine the next chapter of this growing controversy.
